In this activity, students examine a given table of equivalent ratios to reason about a situation involving distance and time. To answer questions, students need to interpret the quantities in the situation and the values in a table that is set up to conflict with what is described. The table has no headers, which makes it less obvious that the value 3,000 is in the wrong place.
The work here prompts students to reason quantitatively and abstractly (MP2) and to attend to precision (MP6). In examining the table, students notice that labels or descriptions of the quantities are important when using a table of equivalent ratios to solve problems.
Arrange students in groups of 2. Give students 2–3 minutes of quiet work time and 1–2 minutes to discuss with their partner.
Han can run 100 meters in 20 seconds. He wonders how long it would take him to run 3,000 meters at this rate. He made a table of equivalent ratios.
| 20 | 100 |
| 10 | 50 |
| 1 | 5 |
| 3,000 |
Invite students to share their response to the first question. Discuss how they knew that the values in the first three rows represent the times and distances of Han’s run. Consider displaying the table and annotating it to illustrate students’ thinking, especially multiplicative reasoning.
Next, discuss how students interpreted the 3,000 in the last row.
Make sure students see that the values in a column are meant to represent the same quantity. While Han would run 3,000 meters in 600 seconds, the 3,000 here represents time in seconds and the missing value is the distance in meters.
Finally, ask students: “What could Han do to improve the table?” (He could label the quantity that each column represents.)